The debate arount density flared up again at the launch of Sustainable House Day at the CSIRO Discovery Centre on 8 September 2009, with the Australian Institute of Architects' ACT President David Flannery continuing his attack on suburbs in general and Gungahlin in particular. There was also a presentation by the ACT Planning and Land Authority's Director of Planning Services Kelvin Walsh on upcoming new suburbs.
I've previously spoken out on these issues, including
on ABC's Stateline, and was invited to the launch to respond to these speakers. Following is the transcript of my responses.
Response to Australian Institute of Architects’ David Flannery:
There is much of the arguments put by the Australian Institute of Architects that is valid. There does need to be increased density in some areas closer to city centres—all of the city centres, not just Civic.
And there are certainly some areas of Gungahlin—altogether too many areas—that are truly cringe-worthy. There are places where I have to focus very intently on the road ahead of my while driving through them so as to avoid looking up in despair. But these areas are not our fault. They were created by politicians and planners and architects and builders both past and present. People bought them often because they were the only places available in a land-stock starved market.
But the AIA have mixed valid arguments up with an unfounded attack on the suburbs in which many of us choose to live.
As people who care about environmental issues, we get used to people from time to time calling us ‘greenies’. We don’t mind, our friends don’t mind, but the name callers are trying to invoke it as a derogative term, to somehow degrade the value or importance of those issues we care about.
So it is with the term ‘urban sprawl’. It’s used as a derogative to try to argue that suburbia is somehow evil.
But is it? Is the AIA’s call for more density based on solid evidence?
A 2005 study by Energy Australia found in fact that high-rise and medium density residential developments are far worse for overall greenhouse impacts than normal suburban housing.